More than 180 million people worldwide have chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection, a major cause of liver cirrhosis and its life-threatening complications including liver failure, portal hypertension, and hepatocellular carcinoma. With the current standard of care of pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin (PEG-IFN-α/RBV), the chances of sustained viral clearance or “cure” are only 40%-50% for genotype 1 infection, which is the most common genotype in western populations. Consequently, there has been a drive to develop new agents specifically targeting essential components of the viral life cycle, such as the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A serine protease. Perhaps the most advanced HCV protease inhibitor in clinical development is telaprevir, which has been shown to improve treatment outcomes when combined with PEG-IFN-α/RBV in genotype 1 infection, and is currently undergoing phase 3 study. In this review, we summarize the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and results of phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of telaprevir, and discuss the likely role of this agent in the future management of CHC.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are uncommon malignancies, highly resistant to chemotherapy, that have emerged as attractive platforms for evaluating novel targeted regimens. Everolimus is an oral rapamycin derivative within the mammalian target of rapamycin class of agents. Preclinical series have shown that everolimus exhibits anticancer effects in RCC and NET cell lines. A phase 3 placebo-controlled study in advanced clear-cell RCC, known as RECORD-1 (for “REnal Cell cancer treatment with Oral RAD001 given Daily”), documented that everolimus stabilizes tumor progression, prolongs progression-free survival and has acceptable tolerability in patients previously treated with the multikinase inhibitors sunitinib and/or sorafenib. Everolimus has been granted regulatory approval for use in sunitinib-pretreated and/or sorafenib-pretreated advanced RCC and incorporated into clinical practice guidelines, and the RECORD-1 safety data are being used to develop recommendations for managing clinically important adverse events in everolimus-treated patients. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating everolimus as earlier RCC therapy (first-line for advanced disease and as neoadjuvant therapy), in non-clear-cell tumors, and in combination with various other approved or investigational targeted therapies for RCC. Regarding advanced NET, recently published phase 2 data support the ability of everolimus to improve disease control in patients with advanced NET as monotherapy or in combination with somatostatin analogue therapy, octreotide longacting release (LAR). Forthcoming data from phase 3 placebo-controlled trials of everolimus, one focused on monotherapy for pancreatic NET and the other on combination use with octreotide LAR for patients with advanced NET and a history of carcinoid syndrome, will provide insight into its future place in NET therapy. The results of a number of ongoing phase 3 evaluations of everolimus will determine its broader applicability in treating breast cancer (in combination with chemotherapy and hormonal therapy), several advanced gastrointestinal cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma, and lymphoma (in the adjuvant setting), as well as the various lesions associated with the tuberous sclerosis complex tumor suppressor gene.

Self-expanding metal stents have become a leading palliative therapy for dysphagia resulting from esophageal, proximal gastric, and mediastinal cancers. Increasingly, fully covered self-expanding plastic stents and now fully covered metal stents have been used to treat a variety of benign esophageal conditions as well as cancer. Several stent designs are available in the United States and many more internationally. Each design has advantages and limitations. Knowledge of the indications for esophageal stenting and the common side effects associated with different designs allows physicians to choose the best stent for a given condition as well as to anticipate complications such as stent migration or restenosis. Compared with partially covered stents, newer, fully covered metal stents may promote less granulation tissue and subsequent stenosis and may be removable even after several weeks. However, the tradeoff may be more frequent migration. Interest in fully covered metal stents in place of fully covered plastic stents for use in strictures and leaks has also grown, despite the lack of a formal indication for metal stents in benign disease. Unfortunately, rigorous studies of newer stent designs are currently lacking.